Lindsay, James E.  “The Subjectivist Principle and the Linguistic Turn Revisited.”  Process Studies 6, no. 2 (Summer 1976): 97-102.

Abstract

Assuming the correctness of Richard Rorty's thesis that, grasping the needs Process and Reality was intended to meet depends on an accurate account of Whitehead's diagnosis of modern philosophy's state; it is argued that Rorty's assessment of both the diagnosis and the needs is inadequate due, in part, to obscurities in the text of Process and Reality concerning the terms 'subjectivist bias', 'subjectivist principle', and 'reformed subjectivist principle'.  These obscurities are dealt with and Whitehead's diagnosis is reassessed in terms of the 'missapprehension of the true status of presentational immediacy'--a far more basic problem than Rorty's 'repeatability and unrepeatability'.  [Abstract from The Philosopher’s Index]