Mead, George Herbert. The Philosophy of the Present, ed. by Arthur E. Murphy. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1959.
Abstract
"This volume contains the material
from which Mr. Mead's Philosophy
of the Present was to have been developed. No part of it,
except the last two Supplementary Essays, was intended for publication
in the form in which it now appears. Chapters One to Four are the Carus
Lectures as read at the Meeting of the American Philosophical
Association at Berkelry in December, 1930. They had not been planned as
more than a partial statement of a more extensive project.
Unfortunately, Mr. Mead, is his capacity as chairman of the department
of philosophy at the University of Chicago, was forced to surrender the
time he had set aside for the completion of the lectures to
administrative concerns of an unexpected and disturbing character. As a
consequence the lectures were written hurriedly, in large part on the
journey from Chicago to Berkeley; and he had no opportunity in the
weeks immediately following their delivery to begin the revisions he
already had in mind. By the end of January he was seriously ill and he
died within a few weeks. As here printed, the lectures are in substance
precisely as they were presented at Berkeley; but the whole has
undergone verbal revision, and the second lecture has been divided to
form Chapters Two and Three. All footnotes are additions to the
original manuscript. After Mr. Mead's death there were found among his
papers two additional manuscripts which are obviously preliminary
drafts of the Carus Lectures. In large part these cover the same ground
as the lectures themselves, but each also contains additional material
of importance. The first three of the Supplementary Essays have been
selected from these manuscripts. In the second, wo parallel versions of
the analysis have been retained. The difficulty of the exposition
seemed to indicate the desirability of such repetition. The titles for
these essays have been supplied by the editor. The fourth Essay is
reprinted from the Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of
Philosophy, and the fifth from the International Journal of Ethics,
April 1925. Each provides an essential aspect of Mr. Mead's theory not
adequately dealt with in the lectures themselves...The importance of
the material as it stands, however, both in the account it offers of
the development of social experience and of scientific hypotheses, and
its suggestion of the more comprehensive theory toward which he was
working seems fully to justify its publication in the only form in
which it can now be made available." - from the Preface